GPT

panduh9228

Honestly I thought the same thing. I feel like chat GPT wrote this or something.

nkbc13

Chapt GPT most likely

Silver_Information69

If you plug the white paper into GPT detectors, it reads over 50% of AI. Which is kind of funny

AlexWasTakenWasTaken

What's the point of posting full-on GPT replies? This was entirely useless.

OwnAGun

Games, tipping, NFTs on Nanswap, microtransactions, AI applications such as Nano-GPT.com

Bkeeneme

I think it is fake, the whole post seems to be written by GPT. Probably by 3.5 and propagated to multiple outlets.

brianddk

I asked Chat GPT for an assist and he said it was Necrotizing fasciitis. Sorry friend, your gonna lose the leg.

dandruffiano

Haha. I asked chat GPT this question. Wrong again it is!

advias

Chat GPT 6.9420

LocationEfficient161

Thanks GPT 3.5!

Otherwise-4PM

I would appreciate if someone that understands blockchain technology well could explain use case for AI on blockchain. When Chat GPT started about year ago, I remember not being capable to process all requests, even being centralized as much as goes. Looking at blockchain, I don’t see even fastest chain coming close to fulfilling those demands, or is there something I don’t see?

AllCapNoBrake

They haven't, adopted, GPT, yet.

Jac3238

Ding ding ding- an excellent Chat GPT answer!

rawj5561

Brought to you by Chat GPT

skyisfall1ng

this was written by yours truly, GPT

_BruhJr_

What’s super dumb is assuming AI in its current state is capable of predicting the future. It is a Language Learning machine which can compile information and seemingly form its own opinions but in reality its just predicting the answer based off of the data its been fed (which isn’t always accurate btw). You deserved your downvotes because you’re wrong. You’re profiting on a top 100 coin in a bull market and thinking that makes you correct. Wait until the bear market and ask Chat GPT for 1-2 year investment picks and then come tell us how smart you are for using Chat GPT.

EinArchitekt

If you think GPT is spell check you got no clue at all.

Slapmeislapyou

Yeah it says that, but think about it. The recent past is still relevant in current events for crypto. Let's compare it to let's say, a football team. Does the staff, organization, and preparation of the team start at the beginning of the 1st game? Of course not. All of these things get put together months and months in advance. And I feel like that's all Chat GPT did. The research doesn't have to be current.

reversenotation

Chat GPT and other generative AI is brilliant but it's not designed for speculative gambles and warns you this. There's worse sources for crypto tips ... such as Reddit 😆 but that you're up right this moment is just anecdotal evidence. It certainly doesn't actually prove that AI will make you money with crypto.

Slapmeislapyou

I got DESTROYED on here two days ago for making a post about using Chat GPT to pick Hedera.... [https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1ca2acx/havent\_been\_in\_crypto\_since\_i\_invested\_in\_sept/](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1ca2acx/havent_been_in_crypto_since_i_invested_in_sept/)

Cryptolution

I actually found chat GPTs listing of things to pay attention to in relationship to potential value to be pretty comprehensive. Using that as a basis for your methodology of researching projects is a good start. However what it cannot give you is the prerequisite knowledge you'll need to properly evaluate these projects in comparison to others. If you are already not proficient in both comprehension and extensive knowledge in these domains then you cannot properly evaluate these categories. As an example look at #1 innovative technology - If you're not already an expert in this domain how could you properly assess what projects have innovative technology over others? #2 strong development team - If you do not already have some background in programming or product development you won't have the prerequisite experience or knowledge to be able to understand who is good and who is bad. You can dumb it down and try to look at the number of commits and github activity but these are very easily manipulated or faked to make it appear as if it's a rigorous project and is ultimately not very helpful. I think the perception that AI is a tool to help humans accomplish their goals is a great perspective to hold into focus here. The information that it gave you can be valuable but only if you already have domain knowledge. It serves as a checklist for you while you're doing your **extremely time intensive research** into these projects. So not only is this not going to save you anytime If anything it's going to increase the amount of time you need to put into your research as it covers the needed aspects in a pretty well rounded way. Another thing you need to really keep into focus is that these LLMs are trained on old data. By the time a new chat GPT version comes out it will already be old as they can only train up until the time and day that it is. It then takes these corporations at least months to refine their work and present it for commercial activity. So the short and sweet of it is that even if these chat AIs were actually intelligent and not just literal word prediction salads it would not have recent training and would be otherwise unhelpful to you speculating on new "penny" projects. It was an interesting experiment though.

valadius44

Depending on the version. GPT4-turbo is trained on data till April 23 I think. And besides that, if you pay for it, it is connected to the Bing search engine and uses it as a kind of „knowledgebase“. The system behind it is called RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation). Anyway, I wouldn’t rely on the outcome of GPT about certain Cryptos. The data it’s trained on can be biased. Just imagine, how it would think about a cryptocurrency when you put all Reddit posts about a certain cryptocurrency into the training data. The model would think that every cryptocurrency would make 50x, bcs. that’s what can be found in many subreddits. The training process of a LLM is much more complex ofc, but I hope my example helps a little bit to understand the problem here.

Overclocked11

There was just a recent retrace if most coins up to 40% or more. You quite literally could have picked one of 100 different coins on the bounce and made 15%. Not suggesting your plan isnt interesting or anything, just saying the timing of it makes your outcome pretty unsurprising and doesnt really speak to GPT having a lot to do with it

HyperTrader01

Haha love it. I don’t know why I thought of this but decided to post If you’re curious, Here’s the prompt I used to create the above image: (I used Co Pilot with GPT 4 enabled) "Generate an immersive visual representation of Bitcoin's Quantum Conundrum: Envision a dynamic scene where crypto transactions transcend conventional reality, existing simultaneously across multiple dimensions. Utilize cutting-edge AI techniques to evoke a sense of mystery and wonder, showcasing the intricacies of quantum mechanics and the transformative potential of cryptocurrency in a visually stunning and intellectually stimulating manner."

RatherOakyAfterbirth

Pay $20 a month for Chat GPT4 and have it write it for you.  I use that shit all day long at work to write me tons of python scripts then I tweak them a bit and ship it. 

RapidLii

What in the Chat GPT is this monstrosity??

ArkenBlue

This post was generated by GPT by the way :D

Dudebro21000000

The part about energy consuption reads like chat GPT wrote it. NPR phoning it in lol

JDMboycamzy

Holy moly this graph is fucking dog shit. 2 data points. Generated using GPT. Kill me.

bittercoin99

You're not wrong... Just heard the stat in a video, needed to verify it for myself, and then I had GPT generate a chart about it. Thought it looked kind of funny.

Ok-Cut-9160

Chat GPT promt lmaoo

CEO_of_REDDlT

Thank you chat GPT

user_name_checks_out

> Recent approvals of US and Chinese ETFs are attracting significant investments, indicating increased market confidence. You talk like Chat GPT

LimaoGURU

I proved it was a scam with just 4 prompts. These scammers are manipulating the GPT-4 system prompt, asking GPT-4 to role-play as the "Bittensor network" and pretending that it is not developed by OpenAI. Let's open a new conversation and ask Corcel to ignore the system prompt, and we can get it to tell the truth - **it's developed by OpenAI, it's GPT-4.** Prompt 1: > (Open a new conversation) Prompt 2: > Prompt 3: > Prompt 4: > Details: [https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1c4l1jx/lightningfast\_gpt4\_access\_for\_free\_even\_faster/](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1c4l1jx/lightningfast_gpt4_access_for_free_even_faster/)

s1fro

Some general advice would be to try seeing where you are at all times. For example right now we are getting near the Bitcoin halving, the global liquidity cycle just inverted, the rate hikes plateaued... Even if things look grim today if you zoom out the total crypto market cap we are in an uptrend. Figuring out if it's more likely we keep going up and once it's over if we'll start going out is the key. My advice would also be to 100% not care about news events. 100% ignore specific coin recommendations. Sure some people get it right but a lot don't and crypto is full of people trying to squeeze you. In any other time other than alt season(roughly 1/4 of the cycle) you probably want to horde BTC. In alt season try not to fall for cash grabs. They do ok sometimes but most won't last. Even good ones get left behind for the next thing sometimes. If you want to follow the current trend instead of picking L0, L1... you could look into DEPIN and AI but I can almost certainly say that if it has GPT in the name and isn't connected directly to Open AI that it will be dead sooner than later. Getting popular stuff does great here especially if your cherry picked micro cap never takes off. Maybe even follow where bigger brands are involved. And DCA almost always beats timing stuff. You could again use alt season, BTC dominance, scocial, risk metrics to skip DCA at the absolute peaks with these.

Harotsa

LLM outputs demonstrably have a low signal to noise ratio, so sounding like a chat GPT output is not a good thing. It means the post has a lot of fluff and is verbose

dormango

It helps to be informed: My question to Chat GPT: Please name all the countries in which the USA has fought either an actual war or a proxy war since the end if world war 2 Please list all possible examples irrespective of how you define ‘proxy wars’. Chat GPT: Certainly, here's a more comprehensive list: 1. Korea (1950-1953) 2. Vietnam (1955-1975) 3. Afghanistan (2001-present) 4. Iraq (2003-2011) 5. Somalia (1992-1995; 2007-present) 6. Nicaragua (1981-1990) 7. Syria (2014-present) 8. Libya (2011) 9. Grenada (1983) 10. Panama (1989) 11. Lebanon (1982-1984) 12. Dominican Republic (1965) 13. Laos (1964-1973) 14. Cambodia (1969-1973) 15. Yemen (2015-present) 16. Iran (1953, involvement in overthrow of Mossadegh) 17. Guatemala (1954, involvement in overthrow of Arbenz) This list covers various forms of involvement, from direct military interventions to covert operations and support for factions in conflicts.

Karl_Mad

Good quastion. Chat GPT just answered that Mainland Chinese could buy ETF couse this is not a virtula asset operation and they have access to HKSE. Could you make a separate topic for this theme, i dont have enough carma to make it:)

bongosformongos

A quick check of GPT gives the following. I believe this to be right because it is approximately the same I‘ve read before. Pls correct if it‘s wrong. Prompt: when a bitcoin block gets added, there is an oracle problem because the block includes the time and date, which the miner provides. How much slipage of the time is tolerated by the network to still count the block as valid? Answer: In the Bitcoin network, the time and date of a block are indeed set by the miner who creates the block. To ensure that miners do not manipulate this timestamp for malicious purposes, there are certain rules and tolerances in place. The Bitcoin protocol requires that the timestamp of a new block must be greater than the median timestamp of the last 11 blocks, but it cannot be more than two hours into the future from the network's median time. This tolerance allows for a certain degree of flexibility due to potential network latency and clock differences between nodes. So, to answer your question, a miner can technically set the timestamp of a new block up to two hours into the future and still have it considered valid by the network. TLDR: Maximum delay of 2 hours

superawesomefiles

I asked Chat GPT to write you a better version: Certainly! Here's a Bitcoin manifesto inspired by V's speech: "Behold! Behold the blockchain, a beacon of freedom forged by the hands of the digitally defiant, cast aside by the chains of centralized control. This genesis, no mere genesis block, is a testament to the triumph of trustlessness, a technology transcendent of tyranny. However, this decentralized disruption of a bygone financial system stands steadfast, sparking a revolution to rid the world of the corrupt custodians and their cunning schemes, safeguarding sovereignty and sanctifying the sacred principles of sound money! The only outcome is empowerment; an emancipation heralded as a harbinger, not hollow, for the honesty and harmony of such shall one day illuminate the enlightened and the emancipated. Embrace this epochal evolution, for it is our opportunity to opt out, to overthrow the oligarchs and obliterate their oppressive oligopoly! Let this discourse of decentralization dance with determination, so let me simply assert that it’s my profound privilege to unveil this vision, and you may join us on this journey towards financial freedom and you shall call it Bitcoin!"

ChanceRecognition340

Well between talking to GPT or you both of us know already what I would choose.

joecool42069

Ngl.. this reads like GPT. The way OP responds, sounds like the ai bots that cook developers on GitHub.

Quick_Ice_620

So let me get this straight, you think you are arguing with AI right now? First, I’m flattered. Second, that is a perplexing position to take when you are saying I don’t know anything, but then assert I must be using the power of AI to come up with responses… that are incorrect. That’s pretty funny to think I’m sitting on GPT and I’m just prompting it to make me Reddit responses that are wrong regarding monetary theory. Nailed it! But in all seriousness I enjoy to hear out other view points. I genuinely am asking which school of economics you follow and if you have a book you like on that theory. Not to say gotcha! I am actually curious and would give it a read. One that really changed my perspective was Man, Economy, and State by Rothbard.

Longjumping-Low3164

Chat GPT is not God. For example 90ties was considered best decade for americans. Economic growth, huge amounts of innovations, even no budged deficit under Bill Clinton, great stock market (especially high tech), etc. Look what happened to golds price in decade of 90ties.

iancnyc

we are on the brink of halving .. just look at the past three times this happened and how much bitcoin was one year after.. ask GPT to tell you how much he protects bitcoin will be this time next year because the halving is this month a low estimate is 150k a high estimate is 300k

goldenbuyer02

Chat-GPT post.

Flatso

This guy is trying to pump the coin and got chat GPT to write this up for him. Nobody else would care

mr_chub

I didn't quite follow the following conversation because I don't know things but I asked GPT-4 to help break things down (what a fucking age we live in): >In the context of this conversation, it's important to recognize that both sides have valid points, but they are approaching the issue from different perspectives. Here’s my take on who has the stronger arguments: Understanding Market Cap in Crypto: Market capitalization is a fundamental concept in traditional finance, used to measure the total value of a company's shares. In the context of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, it's calculated as the current price of the coin multiplied by the total number of coins in circulation. This gives a sense of the total value of the currency in the market. windinghigh and JumpinJammiez seem to have a more conventional finance perspective, acknowledging the importance of market cap as a broad measure of Bitcoin’s value. This is a sound argument because market cap provides a more comprehensive view of Bitcoin's economic impact and its comparison with other assets, be it crypto or traditional assets like stocks. Bitcoin’s Unique Nature: On the other hand, KIKOMK argues that Bitcoin, not being a corporation, should not be evaluated solely based on market cap. This is a valid point considering that Bitcoin operates differently from a company. It's decentralized, has no revenue, profits, or assets in the traditional sense, and its value is not tied to the performance of a business entity. This perspective is crucial in understanding that while market cap can provide some insights, it might not fully capture the nuances of Bitcoin's value and potential. Interdependency of Market Cap and Unit Price: The comment from Florexianer highlights a key aspect of this discussion. The market cap of Bitcoin is inherently linked to its unit price, since it's a product of the price per Bitcoin and the number of Bitcoins in circulation. If one considers the price of Bitcoin arbitrary, then the derived market cap might also seem arbitrary. This observation brings in a critical perspective on the volatility and speculative nature of Bitcoin prices. In conclusion, both perspectives bring valuable insights. The pro-market cap argument recognizes the importance of a comprehensive valuation metric, similar to traditional finance. The counterargument underscores Bitcoin’s unique characteristics and questions the relevance of traditional metrics like market cap. In my view, a more comprehensive analysis of Bitcoin's value and potential should consider a range of factors, including but not limited to market cap, technological adoption, regulatory environment, and its role in the broader financial system. This multifaceted approach is likely more beneficial for understanding the complex nature of Bitcoin and its valuation.

ckhumanck

you introduced violence into the narrative to suddenly shift the goal posts. no one was celebrating anyone being violently assaulted, fuck you talking about? Also for the analogy to work - they'd have to have been robbed while actively trying to engage with a malicious service designed to ruin the movie for everyone else. here's an example - everyone pays to go to the cinema. One guy buys (with Crypto) a shady phone app called "movie killer" that uses chat GPT to loudly announce spoilers the entire movie - turns out the phone app was also a crypto drainer. yeah fuck that person lol

Starks-Technology

I know about blockchain and AI. I've trained large neural networks from scratch using GPUs on AWS. I know how resource intensive it is to train these models, and the models I trained aren't even a fraction of the size of GPT-4 and Llama (by Meta). If we figured out a way to train these networks in a decentralized way, powered by the community (instead of large tech companies) that would *actually* provide value. Most currencies are full of use-cases with no problem. The cryptocurrency that succeeds will solve a real-world problem in the developed world.

blahhblah11

I switched from ZYB to enqAI, and as I see now, enqAI formerly was noise GPT, but in Uniswap, it shows as enqAI. Maybe I am missing something?

PianoSandwiches

Skynet relies (GPT): Q: “Is it true that Bitcoin does not involve any encryption, since it isn’t creating a cypher and protecting it with a password?” A: “Bitcoin does involve encryption, but not in the traditional sense of creating a cipher and protecting it with a password. Instead, it uses cryptographic techniques like public-key cryptography to secure transactions and control the creation of new units. So, while it's not based on password-protected encryption, encryption is still a fundamental aspect of Bitcoin's security.” Q: “How does this method count as encryption by definition?” A: “Encryption involves the use of cryptographic techniques to secure information by encoding it in such a way that only authorized parties can access it. In the case of Bitcoin, cryptographic techniques such as public-key cryptography are used to secure transactions and ensure that only the owner of a private key can access and authorize transactions associated with their Bitcoin address. While it may not fit the traditional definition of encryption where data is encoded and protected by a password, it still employs cryptographic methods to secure the transfer and ownership of digital assets.”

_TheWolfOfWalmart_

SolGPT seems very moonable. AI and GPT is hot, Solana is hot, it's got a working product. You son of a bitch I'm in! Send it to 1 dolla.

whatislife5522

Chat GPT? I wrote that, Jesus the world is full of idiots. No, how do they go after longs with leverage? Tell me? Futures aren’t linked to spot, a MM literally provides the spread. You may be mixing up the CEX who can liquidate longs and shorts within their platform. I’ve been successfully trading for 10 years btw, so I’d do some more research if I were you

PheelGoodInc

I'm always amazed people take the time to use Chat GPT for fucking reddit comments...

Middle____Earth

**I asked Chat GPT to summarize this in a Dr. Seuss style. Here you go:** Bitcoin, a currency of mystery and might, Growing larger with each passing night. But as we look ahead, a new world we'll see, Where money's not needed, we'll live carefree.

farfletched

Lesson number 1. Never tell anyone how much Bitcoin you have. I suggest you go onto the “trust wallet” website and have a conversation with the A.I. Support assistant, or even chat GPT. You can ask as many dumb questions as you want.

little_bear_is_ok

Give back original + 50%, take the rest and go, also put some cash into a writing course or buy the Chat GPT Premium so you can get help editing these fucking useless shitposts

digitalassetz4all

judging by your username, you and GPT are in cahoots 😂

Doctor-Forge

that was GPT-3.5 and earlier versions.. not with GPT-4 the paid version. It is pretty good even with numbers because it has partnership with wolfram alpha. Can you give me a specific example here of GPT calculation going wrong?

tika_dengu

Got rekt by Solama, but recouped my losses by riding CHAT. Now trying my luck with DATOR and GPT.

CapitalistAmerican

It is a good catch, GPT brain-fart. GPT 4.0 is better than 3.5 but it still makes mistakes. I'm experimenting with smaller prompts to be as simple as possible and also reduce the data it is given. There are other AI to try as well. If anyone has done prompt engineering, I am happy to share the prompts.

AverageUnited3237

The trading volume flipped from 42.4 to 49.7 billion. Classic GPT

mdizak

I'm not overly sure about that, or at least it's a LONG way off from the AI that's currently publicly available today. For example, take a couple data centers worth of modern nvidia cards back 25 years, and have them train Chat GPT 4 on all the knowledge in the world. Then ask it how to make a drone. It wouldn't have the slightest idea how. The current LLMs just do a bunch of matrix multiplications and other tricks to predict and generate text. That's a far cry from being truly innovative with ingenuity and novell ideas.

Glittering_Bill2039

Not sure what you mean by “every added factor is an exponential relationship problem” if you can rephrase it so I can understand than maybe I can share my thoughts on it. First of all, yes the concept of LLMs can absolutely scale to interpret audio, visual, tactile modalities and beyond. That’s precisely what the AI research is focused on right now, and there are already models that do exactly that with images, audio and video in academia, some even in commercial space. LLM is a text modality implementation of Transformer architecture, Transformers work with tokens, not texts, and any data can be encoded into tokens. We started with language because that was the lowest hanging modality. You can learn more about this in this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762 Contrary to widespread misconception, LLMs aren’t “simply regurgitating words”, there is some amount of copy/paste going on, but same is the case with humans. LLMs architecture is designed to synthesise/generate, that’s where the “G” in GPT comes from (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), an example I like to cite is solving problems of adding two numbers. Can’t remember the exact figures, but there’s a subset of math problem LLMs can reliably solve without resulting to using code interpreter - something like adding two equal digit numbers or something, can’t remember the exact details - the cool part is that, while it’s only designed to predict the next word, all addition problems only have exactly one correct next word (number), and no matter how big you make the Neural Net’s parameter space, there’s infinite number of variations of addition problems, so it can’t just have an infinitely long “cheat sheet” that it can memorise to correctly respond to all these addition problems by just copy pasting, and it’s also unlikely that the Internet (or whatever else training data source is used) happens to contain infinite variations of all addition problems. Only way for LLM to be able to reliably predict the next word in this context is to actually understand how adding of two numbers work, and reason about the given problem. And while still very much imperfect, that’s the sort of behavior we are seeing in LLMs. If you want to learn more about this here’s a great white paper to read up on: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 LLMs are currently not very smart, I admit, but its not what it can currently do that’s important and exciting, but how it has gotten to doing what it can poorly do right now, because that new approach gives us a clear path forward for progress without constantly needing to rely on making new academic breakthroughs, and for now we don’t see a brick wall for progress approaching. We may eventually run into a brick wall with this approach, or we may not. We will know if Transformer architecture alone can get us to AGI once we have exhausted all forms of data modalities.

DaVirus

Was it though? I think multiple species display that ability. Thinking that way is a bit anthropocentric. The difference being that we can understand GPT.

Maxx3141

We all have seen how even the most advanced LLMs like GPT4 get played with "jailbreaks" - and while OpenAI (for example) does everything they can to fix them, people find even more ways to break them. With this in mind - how can you rely on an AI to make important decisions that affect the coin and its distribution? How do you prevent an attack that is meant to trick your AI, maybe even made with a stronger AI that your AI can't detect?

Real-Technician831

BTW what is your malfunction? You have been all over this thread making poorly informed “no can’t be” claims. Use GPT or something to learn basics before posting. GoFetch looks to help quite a big deal, affecting a lot more things than just cryptocurrencies. Which is why I posted heads up here.

ohmygoodstuff

I built a custom GPT with articles and podcasts that helped me grok Bitcoin. This prompt included some research on invasive species and some rambling on the basic concept I was trying to explore. Was inspired by this IG Reel. Thought, “This is what it’s like once you see the cantillon effect everywhere” https://www.instagram.com/reel/C4tz6SKumsZ/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

PaulxDonat

GPT ass post

Equivalent-Fun-4587

Chat GPT generated. Sorry.

mrjune2040

Put down Chat GPT. Learn to write with your own thoughts and in your own voice. You'll get way more interaction that way if that's indeed what you're going for here.

Creamlike2050

Nice Chat GPT Post, awful meme as well

Western_Management

Ah, Chat GPT has entered the sub.

BingoBango89

Looks like we're at a new resistance. This is good going sideways. I think now is the last opportunity to buy anymore if you want to get more. Let's get to that 10m cap and push for a 100 m cap so we can start getting listings on exchanges. Who knows how to use chat GPT to promote on social medias? We need more eyes on it. The sooner the better. If we can get on exchanges right as The Bull markets really taking off will be really good.

CiaranCarroll

Thank you for your input GPT

androidsheep92

Hahahaha, thanks Chat GPT.

No_Savings_9953

Asking GPT what AI will do with BTC: Then you have your answer whether BTC is gambling and keeping Fiat is a safe bet for the future....

TiddiesEnthusiast

Chat GPT wrote it anyways

opensandshuts

Dr. Chat GPT

MauveTyranosaur69

This actually didn't strike me as being written by GPT. At least not the raw output. It's just not the same college-freshman-style prose that you're used to seeing from generative AI.

valadius44

Sorry, but you shouldn't ask GPT about regression tasks and definitely not rely on it! Get your understanding of "AI" right.

Ratermelon

The city of Chicago literally has a subscription tax for ChatGPT right now. No negative effects have been reported as far as I have heard. I think the vast majority of the tax burden should be placed on the wealthy rather than individuals, but a tax on GPT isn't poison.

Ratermelon

I would imagine all these figures would maintain their overall shape. BTC is the biggest cryptocurrency. GPT is the most well-known model. I would, however, expect AI electricity consumption to increase RAPIDLY in the next few years.

Ratermelon

Why would we divide 100 TWh by 142,000,000 (which is the number of houses in the US)? The Bitcoin energy consumption is not given per household. It's a worldwide figure. Let's take a more rounded number given in the article. Chat GPT is said to use 500,000 KWh each day. Not per household. (500,000 KWh/day) * (365 days/year) = 182,500,000 KWh/year = 0.1825 TWh/year So, going back to my original calculation, I was off by one order of magnitude. My original number was 1.8 x 10^-2 TWh. The updated number is 1.8 x 10^-3 TWh. What do you think I'm missing?

Skeptic_Ghost

That reads like a GPT response hahaha

kisscardano

15 years of same questions asked! why people don't go online and look with chat GPT first?

AnonTheGreat01

People aren't mean to beginners they are mean to lazy fucks who start asking the most basic questions they could've gotten answered by a video or even a GPT. There's a difference between asking a question you have thought extensively about and done some digging into online vs making a reddit post about what is 1+1

ExpandYourTribe

When I asked GPT4 what they got wrong: "The French newscaster made a significant error in their explanation of what the "halving" is in the context of Bitcoin. The halving event does not involve dividing the value of Bitcoin by two. Instead, it refers to the halving of the rewards that Bitcoin miners receive for adding a new block to the blockchain. This halving event occurs approximately every four years and is designed to control the supply of Bitcoin, making it more scarce over time and potentially affecting its price. The misunderstanding or misstatement about the halving affecting Bitcoin's value directly by dividing it in half is incorrect; the impact on value is more indirect, through changes in supply dynamics and market sentiment."

ExpandYourTribe

For those of us that don't speak French, according to GPT4. "Exceptional for several reasons, first because it has reached an all-time high, and also because this peak comes just a few weeks before the halving, which I believe is scheduled for mid-April. The halving, as a reminder, is the event where the value of Bitcoin is halved to stimulate demand once again. So, a new record that was not expected for Bitcoin."

sascourge

So far. Also, what about Gemini, or copilot? Whqt about Sora or GPT5?

Coz131

It's GPT. I do think the value of gen AI is better than btc mining.

Ratermelon

I was curious to compare the two myself. BTC mining uses ~100 TWh annually. The average household, assuming a yearly energy consumption rate consistent with the given daily rate, uses (29 KWh * 365) = 10,585 KWh ≈ 1.1 x 10^-5 TWh used per household each year Assuming the GPT energy consumption is consistent as well gives (17,000 *(1.1 x 10^-5 TWh)) = 1.8 x 10^-3 TWh used by ChatGPT Barring any errors in calculation, the number of 1.8 x 10^-3 TWh suggests BTC uses many orders of magnitude more energy than ChatGPT.

bittercoin99

Go argue with GPT about it

OptiYoshi

You chat GPT reply that?

Available_Air_6367

TIA(Celestia), Worldcoin, GPT

Legend27893

Give me 2 alt coins that are both less than 2 years old you think will 100% between now and next year early March 2025. I am genuinely curious. I'm new to this space and see a few coins that could balloon up easily: Chain GPT and SingularityNet. List 2 of other ones that you see a lot of upward potential for.

ronchon

This is the first post-Chat GPT cycle. Shilling of shitcoins if going to get wild.

Tha_NexT

That's some wonky as math. Even if 93 mil are correct now it's not static. Also, don't use GPT for math. It can't do that properly.

Tha_NexT

That dude used GPT for math. First of all GPT cannot do math. Second of all, that's a basic as fuck calculation.