JPM

Takeoff_V1

return on fractional shares would be low and not sure if its worth your time. Instead of buying options, you can also consider buying actual shares of stocks of good companies that offer minimal risks like BA, AMD, JPM, GS, GILD, and JNJ and many others.

Takeoff_V1

u/JamesAQuintero - take a look at the option chain for May 7 - 10 days out for QQQ, look also for BA chain 13 days out, JPM for 13 days out, WFC for 13 days out, etc, etc...there are whole bunch of stocks with options ITM and near the money that can be bought for $500, you just got to spend some time to research and don't expect things to be delivered in a silver plate. A good investor will find ways to grow their investment regardless if they are starting out with $500 or $100K.

Straight_Turnip7056

**JPM and banks in general,** because they don't die. Besides ETFs, and I don't think you meant to include also ETFs as stocks, it is very very hard to manage emotions and HODL for even more than 2 years.. unless it's a dud stock which you've just forgetten because it never becomes more than 5% of your portfolio. E.g. **Unilever** (which is just now starting to sprout). Once upon a time, I had many gems like MSFT, AMD. But I like to review my whole portfolio once a quarter, and noticing that there is "**too much exposure**" to a few winners, I cut my positions down on xmas 2023.. Needless to say, I kick myself daily. I won't repeat this mistake with some bank stocks I have like JPM and Citi. Yes, a rate hike will be risky, but risk is already priced in too much in their valuations, and because they're systemically important, they always get a flu-shot from dear gov.

fun-vie

I don't totally disagree with your assessment but the only positions I've sold are the bank stocks. They are going to be the first to show weakness. Why? As you point out, credit debt is at a historic high, though charge [off rates are not](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CORCCACBS) and delinquencies[ are not](https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?id=DRCCLACBS). M1 is "an issue" but for the purposes of analyzing dry powder and it's impact on the market I prefer M2 which didn't change due to the feds reclassification of savings accounts. M2 shows that there are several trillion - maybe around 4T +/- 1T in individual accounts which accrued during COVID. This is a pretty substantial amount of cash. There has been a bit of a draw down (about 1T) but I think that is due to people spending their COVID checks and now going back to work. The real question is [who has control of it](https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/understanding-bank-deposit-growth-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-20220603.html) and how will they spend it. So this IMO is the cushion for the markets. Everyone is calling this "dry powder". It may well be, or it might get spent down if there is a substantial recession. I think when you dig into the inflation data you see the day to day stuff suffering from less inflation now but that certain discretionary categories such as "beer garden" and small food items out of the house as increasing and taking the averages up with them. These are the sorts of things that people with discretionary income buy. There is also the insurance issue - but this will have to be a regulatory fix because in many states it is not legal to drive a car without insurance. Energy is a variable but to some extent the government has control over this with the SPR. More importantly, the White House has control over it. When we look at the American income and expense statement we find that there has been a [huge increase](https://apps.bea.gov/iTable/?reqid=19&step=2&isuri=1&categories=survey#eyJhcHBpZCI6MTksInN0ZXBzIjpbMSwyLDNdLCJkYXRhIjpbWyJjYXRlZ29yaWVzIiwiU3VydmV5Il0sWyJOSVBBX1RhYmxlX0xpc3QiLCI1OCJdXX0=) (Line 30) in non-mortgage debt service which is starting to suppress discretionary spending. The question is, what does this look like when sliced across the different income ranges? Moving on - unemployment benefits being paid out hasn't really gone up very much over the last year. I think this is the only absolute measure of layoffs and their effect on the economy. The number of new jobs and things may be skewed by "gig" economy type employment though I've found little to indicate that people are really desperate except for U6 which has gone up but not much in absolute numbers. It is possible that people being laid off are taking on lower wage jobs but the hourly and weekly data seem to indicate that wages are keeping pace with inflation at the moment on average. The total increase in prices over the 4 years though is a problem and is unlikely to be fixed without some very large change. Housing is housing - the prices are correcting, they will go back up when rates go down again. Unless you really have to move in the next 5 or 10 years you probably will be fine. Fortunately, after the housing crisis most mortgages in the US are now 30 yr fixed. That said, this is going to limit the mobility of labor in the US which IMO isn't a good thing. Rents will probably go up if commercial loans underlying those properties come due. My thought is this - do rate increases fix any of this? I say no and that they are in the process of crushing the average American consumer. Meanwhile, the capital holders are just fine and still paying the high rents because they can, my question would be what % of the economy are these people in terms of spending? This will give us some idea of how long the charade might last. So the strategy is not to sell it all but to sell off sector by sector. For example, about two months ago I sold off all but one of my bank stocks. Why? The NCO rates are sky rocketing. We could see that before any of the commercial card carriers reported. Sure enough, looking at JPM, BAC we see higher NCO's. Discover recently reported a much higher rate as well. This is an area of risk for them. In terms of absolute values, it's not that bad yet. I think in general the debt markets are easily an area of risk. The other lending markets, auto and mortage as a whole are not bad yet. Also, the higher rates are a drag for the banks to due to interest paid for the deposits. Banks are also not a "favorite" of the market and get punished quickly. I think what we are going to see are continued downward revisions to forward P/E as people just can't spend and get into trouble. So, start looking where the distressed consumer is and the businesses they frequent and that will be where the trouble is. It will expand from there. I would be surprised if this were some overnight cataclysmic crash. But I think you are going to see individual companies posting bad results and slowly and steadily taking the indexes down with them. Despite the dry powder, it is going to be hard to justify high P/E ratios in a what is the beginnings of a distressed economy.

Wirecard_trading

I get what you are saying, but at the same time neo banks and brokers emerge and take shares of Goldman and JPM

fkn_clownshoes

NYCB next? also why it’s good to own JPM. they ain’t going anywhere

rocier

JPM collapsing

Traditional_Bowl2760

[https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-warns-stock-market-sell-off-has-further-to-go-080049554.html?fr=sycsrp\_catchall](https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-warns-stock-market-sell-off-has-further-to-go-080049554.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall) What all of you think? JPM thinks more downward journey

Cum-Financia1Advis0r

JPM Financial Advisors are fucking pussies NTRS Financial Advisors are the Navy Seals of Financial Advisors 

WendysSupportStaff

JPM gonna go back to it's ATH in less than a week. fucking hilarious.

OkAnt7573

While I wish you the best, and own SOFI, they are never going to be a top 10 bank. EVER. That isn't their business model and you don't want it to be. Fortunately none of that is required to have SOFI be quite successful, it's just a different business model. Anytime I see people comparing SOFI to JPM it does make me nervous.

Reasonable_Wealth_24

Picking up shares of ProShares UltraShort (SDS) and adding JPM Ultra Short Income (JPST) as FI (Fixed Income) yields continue to rise. Like Cardi B lyrics says, “If it’s up, then it’s up, then it’s up, then it’s stuck.” Until the Fed gets it unstuck easy money on the short end of the curve. #easymoney

Yogurt_Up_My_Nose

y'all notice how JPM has been quietly recovering it's losses. thats some funny shit. it'll be back at ATH in a week.

Fun-Veterinarian-401

I don't--investing isn't about emotion or conscience, investing is about making money. I have no ties whatsoever to NVDA, BRK.B, RTX, DG, Alphabet, PFE, JPM, LLY, XOM, and others because more often then not they make me way way more money then they cost me. I have no direct connection to most any of their products. Now, I choose not to invest in Tobacco companies because I find it repugnant...but that's hardly a moral stance.

BetweenCoffeeNSleep

Jamie Dimon’s job is to not lose money. He’s the CEO of a bank, and banks rely on confidence in security of the client’s money. Dimon’s risk aversion and emphasis on ‘fortress balance sheet’ are why JPM has avoided being victims of the GFC and 2022 banking scare, and we’re in position to absorb other banks during those. JPM is as huge as they are, specifically because of Dimon.

trivo8888

This is a bizarre take. Dimon is cautious and JPM is near ATH

BetweenCoffeeNSleep

I don’t use picked stocks for long term holds. All of my long term stuff is index based. I won’t hold a stock without a specific thesis, and I think it’s very difficult to nail a thesis over a long timeframe. All of my picks are 1-7 month swing trades. For the sake of conversation, though… if I had to pick 5 blindly, I’m taking 5 very stable companies. BRKB, JPM, PG, V, KO.

InternationalRow8437

I swear, JPM always contradict themselves, hedging both sides. lol

BoxofCurveballs

Fingers crossed. JPM actually quit shitting the bed today as well so that was amazing.

95Daphne

This META move is: 1. Bigger than JPM. 2. Has a much better comp to me over JPM, which I cited in my previous post (PANW). Even though I don't think this is comparable with JPM, it's still a bit soon to say things are all gucchi with them.

AlphaHarmony

My assumption is that it would trade like JPM. They beat earnings too but the guidance was not spot on and they had been at highs. That is now recovering nicely. However, they didn't fill the gap from their previous earning surprise like meta did. I mean, it literally looks like Meta was just a gap fill from previous earnings – totally wild

p00pTy

nobody talks about crybros anymore. motherfuckers wouldnt shut up when $60k last time; where the $100k bitches go? i need jamie dimon telling me the future of currency is solid. dude over there licking indian nuts for capital or some shit. fuck JPM, get rekt.

Straight_Turnip7056

Yes, we're forgetting the debt part and cost of borrowing from ECB/wherever they raise cash from. The cash is actually a liability for the bank, whereas lending money is their 'asset'. And, you think this MegaCap French bank with employees always on lunch break, and work culture rooted in socialism, can really compete with UBS, Barclays, HSBC, Citi, JPM??

Atakeoptions

!p JPM

Traditional-Year3847

someone pissed at JPM?

JakeTappersCat

Analyst don't know what to do with Netflix lmao >Netflix price target lowered by $14 by Rosenblatt >Needham upgrades Netflix to Buy >Netflix price target raised by $10 by Evercore ISI >Netflix price target raised by $50 by BofA >Netflix price target raised by $76 by Wells Fargo >Netflix price target raised by $110 at Bernstein >Netflix reduced disclosures may hurt investors - Citi >Netflix 2024 revenue outlook weighing on shares - JPM >Canaccord downgrades Netflix to Hold on limited growth catalysts >Netflix price target raised by $35 by Pivotal Research >Netflix price target raised by $25 at Duetsche Bank Make up your goddamn minds!

StructureUsed1149

If anyone wanted a tip, made good off JPM calls. The amount Berkshire Hathaway has invested in Bank of America is also something to look at for a possible call. Could hit 40$ by tomorrow.

CD_4M

I did check, that’s why I’m saying what you said isn’t even close to true. VISA makes more than a lot of banks, and no bank makes anywhere near 10x what V does. I was just using market cap as a simple illustration of how off base you were in considering the scale and influence of V. Yahoo finance has V with higher market cap than JPM but that’s really not the part, regardless Visa is a monster even in the world of banks.

gammatrade

Joys of earnings you never know. I used to spend hours trying to set up trades on these and would usually figure it out but then it didn’t matter as the CEO comments or whatever would skew it. Last week JPM beats estimates and Mr. Dimon Doom spouts off about economic storm clouds and down it goes. Fun fun.

BlackBastado-2124

I own some JPM that I am thinking about bailing out

jinxztheghost

I I've read that JPM ETF has had a great year the past year but I am wary of the coming year with recession / market crash scares.. Do you believe that it will follow again this year with the looking recession and market volatility or would it be better to invest in a more "recession proof" stocks re transport / energy?

technoexplorer

The biggest components of the stock market are big enough you can own their shares directly and make a diversified basket with them. So like... a share of JPM, a couple of Amzn, etc, might make sense for you.

Ancient-Scientist456

MARA, JPM, AZN, SOFI, RIOT, C. All calls obviously

datcommentator

One option is to hold a more diversified portfolio, including some solid blue chip stocks like MSFT, CRM, MA, WM, CRM, IQV, BRK.B, JPM, TJX, TGT, AMAT, and ASML.

Odisee09

In for Tesla C, VRT P, Boeing P, JPM C. We shall see if investing works

MurkyAnteater4059

do you really think people at wall streets trading floor or Citi or JPM see a double top or triple top or quintuple top and think to themselves "oh shit a x top has formed, better sell cus it's going down"

TaxGuy_021

Consider buying preferred shares in JPM or a company similar to that. It's not as secure as T-bills, but you can get higher returns and better after tax results.

Atakeoptions

!p JPM

StonksPeasant

The USD is used in most crime, bitcoin doesn't even come close to being used in as much crime. JPM essentially controls legacy finance, bitcoin is a threat to that so it makes sense for them to be critical of it in the open while being for it behind closed doors (they are an authorized participant for blackrocks bitcoin etf).

SRSCapital

[sec.gov](http://sec.gov), tradingview, options chain on my broker, excel (though more and more google sheets). That's really it. And [sec.gov](http://sec.gov) is actually getting used less and less because most of the pertinent information I care about is done really well in tradingview's financials view. Sometimes my idea starts with something interesting on the chart (such as my recent AAPL play I just posted about) in which I saw that it was getting back to the 2023 October bottom and could bounce and even if it didn't there was a value zone right underneath that local bottom. After seeing that I went and pulled the financials and did a quick value analysis and got my "fair value" range. In AAPL's case I found that it was very close to the bottom of that range AND that the very bottom of that range was inside the value zone I saw on the chart. Then I pulled up the option chain to see if there was a way to play for this bounce using options or if I should just outright buy shares. In this particular case I found that the May 155p was providing good value (due in part to the upcoming earnings) and that the 170c for this week was relatively cheap. So based on fundamentals and technicals I was able to enter the 155p/170c diagonal risk-reversal for about $1.63 credit. I close most of them just not for about $0.63-0.65 with some extra puts left over so I can milk them a bit more since I don't mind buying the shares at 155. Other times it starts with the fundamentals first such as a recent trade in JPM I made. I keep a google sheet updated regularly with various stocks and the "fair value" that I calculate for myself and a couple weeks ago I saw that JPM was severely undervalued right after their earnings drop even with their lower guidance (again, based on my own way of calculating value, you don't have to agree here just explaining my process). So when I saw how undervalued the shares were I checked the chart just to see what it said and saw that it was in the bottom of it's range and could either stay flat or bounce based on the indicators I like to use. This just gave me a bit of confidence to enter when I did with how much size I did more than anything else. When I checked the chain I saw that the 30 delta put had decent value and since I'm happy to buy at current prices I went with a straight cash-secured put setup, again, because I thought price would stay flat in the short term or start to move back up. Those are the two main ways I find trades and how I go about researching them. As far as finding tickers to actually look at sometimes it's from people in my trading group's discord where people are always looking for random stuff, sometimes it's from twitter, sometimes from my own universe of \~300 stocks that I regularly keep tabs on which is all stuff I've just built up over time when I was in school and after when I was purely a Buffettonian value guy.

ThinkingOfTheOldDays

agreed, I would stick to JPM if you wanted to gamble on the sector.

Eastern-Cranberry84

JPM looks fine

Eastern-Cranberry84

JPM slowly gaining back that 10%...

potato111a

Alo, is this JPM MS and Citty bank? I would like to order one giant green dildo on AAPL please. Ty.

potato111a

JPM and Morgan Stanley trying to pump AAPL. Guys should I be worried?

TheDigitalDivine

With that JPM upgrade and Middle East tensions LMT definitely has some upside this year but those two things might have already been baked into the price action from last week.

ThunderboltSorcerer

Why would JPM and BOA's opinion matter? That's not data either. TSMC will alternate production over time, there's no guarantee that anything will be going up in a parabolic and straight line. There will be lulls, it is however, still the future. That "ideal" is how you invest in the long-term. Unless you are a short-term buyer/seller which relies on looking at short time periods and saying "omg there was a dip in X sales, everyone divest and panic!!"

deepvinter

None of what you said contains any hard data, just loose ideals about “this is the future.” Did you see TSMC’s quarterly results? Did you read JPM or BOA’s quarterly results?

Noticeably98

And JPM?

ObjectiveLanguage

If I said that 3-4 rate cuts would happen this year and investors put money in the market in anticipation of those rate cuts, then later turned around and said that the cuts may not happen after all, wouldn't it be completely reasonable for the investors to take that money back out? I don't get your point here... nothing suggests that this is just a simple correction, it's a re-evaluation of the overall market and economy for the intermediate future. You can also see this in bond yields that have skyrocketed over the past couple weeks. Also, earnings don't mean shit without good guidance. Look at the earnings that have been posted in the past couple weeks: JPM, LULU, NFLX, TSM, SMCI just to name a few. The problem today was that SMCI did not give guidance on their expected numbers like they did previously when things were good especially since it came in right after TSM. This led investors to draw the conclusion that the entire semiconductor industry might be hitting a slowdown, which caused today's tech selloff. Maybe people will have more hope for AMD or MSFT, but that won't prop up the entire S&P500 because AAPL has poor expectations and NVDA doesn't report till June. I'm not saying there won't be a bounce next week. I'm just saying your logic is wrong. The market has dropped harder than this in a 7 day period before (it's only down \~4% since last Friday compared to \~8% down Jan 2022 or \~7% Aug 2022), it can happen again.

Financial-Length-846

$JBLU callls I only see good out of it, low expected earnings compared with a boost in JPM predicted price and other airline companies that where in the shithr performed decent like BA. I think a yolo in shares might bring me back from the dead

RevolutionaryPhoto24

JPM just received another hundreds of millions judgement against them for fraud.

RevolutionaryPhoto24

Oh, he likes blockchain. Instituting it, in fact, at JPM. He also likes his money and the current system. Therefore, bitcoin bad.

MoonBasic

I think multiple things can be true at the same time. You might not believe in a certain field or technology but you see the potential in making margin off of it in the market. Also JD might be the head of the bank but there are also multiple execs that manage their own P&L as well that see things differently. So I guess it only makes sense that JPM dips their toes in it - while their CEO has his own opinion.

Cool_Understanding_9

I recovered with SPY puts but I didn't see JPM calls going up today. broke even for the week again

GeoffSproke

There's precisely 0% chance that the poster got an email from JPM promising 19% annual return. There's a slight chance that he got a spam email, and an extraordinarily high chance that they listed their returns from the last year and the OP told himself that was what he could expect from them in the future.

but_why_doh

What did I say that was wrong? They paid back all the money in 2009, and had the capital to purchase Bear Sterns and Washington Mutual during this time. I don't consider it to be book licking when it's an objective fact that JPM weathered 2008 better than any bank in the US

viewmodeonly

He isn't right. Bitcoin is the best performing asset in human history. It's comical to bring up what Buffett thinks when BTC is more valuable than all of Berkshire Hathaway. JPM / Blackrock / Fidelity are all getting in the game because they understand that 0% allocation to Bitcoin is the only incorrect risk / reward assessment. Zero is the only wrong answer.

but_why_doh

JPM didn't fail in 2008, because Dimon had the best balance sheet of any bank in 2008. It was JPM and Wells Fargo that didn't use the bailout money, just paying it back in a few weeks, and they only participated in the bailout to give some level of confidence in the American financial system

but_why_doh

I mean, he is right. It has nothing going for it outside of speculation. No one is denying the potential that blockchain technology has for innovation, but when literally every single value investor/large figure says that this isn't really worth buying into (Buffett said he wouldn't buy all of bitcoin for $20) then I'd just stay away. As for the argument that JPM participates in bitcoin/crypto, well, yeah. They're a bank. Banks buy literally anything. They're hedging their risks. What you have to recognize is that crypto likely makes up a miniscule amount of their total portfolio, and they're only playing with it because they see money, not because they see a good investment.

Samjabr

I think it's literally AXP and JPM - or it would be dead.

DeansFrenchOnion1

Check the email address. JPM is too prestigious to offer something as ludicrous as 19% returns

FahkDizchit

JPM legal and compliance bout to kill a rep

scientropic

Where does this 19.5% return come from? JPM can’t seriously be promising a 19.5% return. None of this is to say its managed brokerage service would be a good value. There are plenty of people around who want pros to manage their money for them. But when making this kind of decision, the most important factors are cost and process. How will it be managed? Just a return number, whether an actual past return or aspirational future return, is near the bottom of the list of things to consider in making a decision like this.

ParkSt-Hooligan

Banks act in the best interest of the Bank, not their clients. A friend bought Calls on Apple from their JPM broker, paid 12$ an option when market was 5$. When he realized it they called him out and the broker goes "you caught me", with no remorse.

BagofBabbish

Blackrock has reason to care. They actually have material money in the game and they want clients to be invested in it over the long run so they can collect their fees. JPM is an admin that doesn’t care.

Acceptable-Emu8516

Telling y’all boys right now if you hop in the JPM 185c you will be rich

Acceptable-Emu8516

185c JPM??

dvdmovie1

This went public at 8ish at the end of 2022 and has lost 78%. There have been a lot of various battery plays that people have been excited about in the last few years, it feels like most of them have not done very well (FREY another one that I saw talked up a couple years ago and since then it's lost about 90%) and now that you have EVs cooling, I'd imagine the interest cools further until that changes. This is a 150M market cap name; I'd be a little skeptical of their abilities. Also, when all of these battery names have been obliterated, imo the market is trying to tell me something about them. Beyond other issues, as someone else said, these sorts of early stage names are not going to fare well in an environment of persistently higher rates. JPM talking about transition to green energy taking "a generation" vs people acting as if this can be accomplished over several years. https://www.ft.com/content/352b38a7-f298-4b54-adc2-f4cc1b17444b "In its report, JPMorgan said changing the world’s energy system “is a process that should be measured in decades, or generations, not years”. It added that investment in renewable energy “currently offers subpar returns” and that if energy prices rose strongly, there was even a risk of social unrest."

SpontaneousDream

He is clearly attempting to drive the price down, as usual. Counter trading this clown is too easy. Any BTC that is sub $100k is an absolute bargain for institutions like JPM. Also I find it hilarious that there are *still* people on this sub that believe Bitcoin is a scam, after all of these years, price growth, usage growth, millions of users, ETFs, government/company balance sheets, entire industries and companies built around it, etc. Some of you will just never get it.

DeansFrenchOnion1

Imagine all the hours, missed family events, damage on your long term health and happiness one must spend to become CEO of JPM just to be in the same position as some of these mega-millionaire Bitcoin people who didn’t do shit. I too would have animosity.

pr1ceisright

Didn’t JPM even make their own coin?

usedlastname

A 2 min read into JPM past should answer whether they are evil or not!

TrophyWifeAspiration

JPM is at $175 bb! 😍😍😍🥰🥰

Cum-Financia1Advis0r

JPM Private Client Advisors in shambles

BoxofCurveballs

I fucked myself on JPM but TSM fucked me hard as well.

fun-vie

It is simple - well, maybe not... the CPI data is showing that some good and services are falling, the basics. The people who still have money and have not cut back spending are fueling inflation in other areas of the market. So from a CPI perspective those people are winning. However, the rate hikes are starting to take their toll. The US Consumer has less discretionary income than last year and interest repayment for things like CC debt is increasing rapidly. And a tricky one is insurance which for some states is mandated for basic things like cars. This will require a regulatory intervention because those consumers can't operate their cars without insurance. Looking at recent earnings - they aren't great. While meeting expectations BAC's top line items were down YoY and cited rates as part of the problem. Additionally every major bank with consumer credit exposure so far has reported substantial increases in NCO's. JPM reported a 185% increase in CC delinquency. We're starting to see regional banks and community banks also reporting some trouble in consumer and commercial loans. Goldman was just fine but they don't dabble in the exciting pot of honey that is consumer credit. So far the dramatic increase in CC delinquency hasn't show up in other lending but it is likely a matter of time. Reading some of the forward looking statements - they are not positive. I suspect this trend will continue. The rate hikes are a bad idea and punishing for a swath of America. Additionally, credit card defaults are also bad for the economy because with a less desirable credit rating, the ability of that consumer to participate in a responsible and economically efficient way is hindered until their rating goes up. It's all bad news from here while rates remain high. Pay attention to Forward P/E's going forward....

kylestoned

im 2/2 for earnings. I had JPM puts last week, and BX puts for this morning. There's no way I go 3/3. I am going AXP puts. Inverse me for 100% win chance.

guitmusic12

Might be looking at separately lists, JPM was 6th for me

bb483

JPM 🙏

Xiodes

Bro, inversing is starting to sound like the hella play. Shoulda inversed JPM who tanked with good earnings, shoulda inversed UAL who pumped with shitty earnings, should inveresed TSM who absolutely DUMPED with solid earnings. Father help.....

Pentatonic_Pangolin

Just need JPM to go up another 4% and I’ll make a profit

Unlucky-Simple7870

JPM?

jraiv420

Even my shitty AAPL and JPM long is printing bers fuked 🤡

JangoDjarin

JPM 187.5 call for 5/3

Unlucky-Simple7870

What ever happened to the $210 price target for AAPL by JPM 

potato111a

JPM CNBC guy said to buy poots. 

Pentatonic_Pangolin

Getting wrecked by JPM, down 50% on a 3 month call that I bought after the 6% drop. Am I screwed? Or should I hold?

WendysSupportStaff

JPM needs to back up 10%

NVDAPleasFlyAgain

JPM and GS have been wrong at least 43 times in the last 11 predictions they made

dicksoutforstonks

0 for 2 so far this earnings season. Had calls for JPM and puts for UAL. 

BitcoinRefuge

JPM says higher rates are actually driving inflation and we need to cut.

Eastern-Cranberry84

JPM you shouldn't be 10% down.

Moose_knucklez

JPM first, apparently.

peterpeer9

JPM emptying their vault to manipulate SLV

sluttyseinfeld

You’re right you cracked the code. Do you work for GS or JPM?

Pentatonic_Pangolin

Need JPM to rip or Im gonna have to tell my wife we can’t travel to Japan

extrapartytime

slow bleed all week theta wins and we’ll be under 500 prime for calls next week. BANKS are Getting SLAUGHTERED. Especially consumer banks. JPM and Goldman are DIFFERENT because of INSTITUTIONS.

Scary-Wishbone-3210

JP speaks tomorrow? F me. I have $900 of calls on $185 for JPM, down 30% right now. But everytime he speaks it absolutely takes my anus to pound town. Good or bad it is almost always the opposite direction.

lipmanz

So to recap the first 2 days of earnings season, JPM beat by 8%, GS beat by 30% and SPY drops 3%….